Community Update #118
|
Posted 2023-11-17 12:40:33
|
Emberrfall #11183 |
|
Posted 2023-11-17 12:40:53
|
 stained #43996 |
|
Posted 2023-11-17 12:41:11
 I do agree with Beowolf that apothecary has a better ring to it, but either way a new role is exciting
|
 cr0wfeathers #14965 |
|
Posted 2023-11-17 12:42:47
|
ArcticSnowyOwl #124175 |
|
Posted 2023-11-17 12:53:01
I am a little anxious that everyone who did not know anything about the concept of "Alchemist role" and the discussion around it as well as possible tweaks to this idea that were discussed in previous news will vote "yes" just because they want a new role.. |
 Bluejay #5910 |
|
Posted 2023-11-17 12:54:09
|
 🍂 Leonca 🐆 #54339 |
|
Posted 2023-11-17 12:56:59
Interesting to see how the poll is going after the Herbalism role was talked about last month, I thought there's be more votes for no based on how that last news post went. I'm mostly neutral towards the role existing, I hope there's further talk about how it's implemented though since I wasn't keen on some of the points in the original post. And the server upgrade woooo! Very excited about that! I'm a little concerned about there being chances for multi-day outages for some players and what that means for site features though. Will things like the daily RO counter and leaderboards be paused until the work is complete? Short-term outages are unpredictable and impossible to plan for, but for something like this it would be nice if those were paused for everyone so no one is left out (speaking of, Pigeon still needs a quest added from when it was bugged =( ) |
 Embers #3501 |
|
Posted 2023-11-17 13:02:16
|
clupis #2478 |
|
Posted 2023-11-17 13:04:08
|
 mercurie #35270 |
|
Posted 2023-11-17 13:15:03
|
 Lightning.Xx #75410 |